From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 23 8:45:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from c014.sfo.cp.net (c014-h017.c014.sfo.cp.net [209.228.12.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16E7437B43F for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 08:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (cpmta 26738 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2000 08:45:29 -0700 Received: from m12hRs4n205.midsouth.rr.com (HELO development1) (24.95.125.205) by smtp.valuedata.net with SMTP; 23 Aug 2000 08:45:29 -0700 X-Sent: 23 Aug 2000 15:45:29 GMT Message-ID: <001f01c00d18$e9bfa100$0200000a@development1> From: "Daryl Chance" To: "FreeBSD Hackers" References: Subject: Re: 4.1 Release....MIIBUS Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 10:43:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ok, thanks for clearing this up...I haven't tried it with my realtek cards, but I know the Netgear ones need it :). Thanks again, -------------------------------------------------------- | Daryl Chance | I have made this letter longer then | | Valuedata, LLC | usual because I lacked the time to | | Memphis, TN | make it shorter. -- Blaise Pascal | -------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Scheidt" To: "Daryl Chance" Cc: "FreeBSD Hackers" Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 10:30 AM Subject: Re: 4.1 Release....MIIBUS > On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Daryl Chance wrote: > > :Hi, > : > :I know that in 4.0 Release that miibus was required, though > :not marked. I noticed that 4.1 Release miibus is still not > :marked as (required), is it no longer required, or is it still > :not marked? I ahven't tried compiling it with miibus commented > :out, I'm just assuming it's still required > : > > MIIBUS is only required if you have an ethernet adapter that requires it. > If you try to include such a device, and not MIIBUS, I'm not at all suprised > that the compile fails. It is certainly possible to build a kernel without > MIIBUS, though. None of my fxp(4) equipped machines use it, for instance. > > > David > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message