From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 2 06:57:57 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA27455 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 2 Jul 1995 06:57:57 -0700 Received: from wdl1.wdl.loral.com (wdl1.wdl.loral.com [137.249.32.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id GAA27449 for ; Sun, 2 Jul 1995 06:57:56 -0700 Received: from miles.sso.loral.com (miles.wdl.loral.com) by wdl1.wdl.loral.com (5.x/WDL-2.4-1.0) id AA06103; Sun, 2 Jul 1995 06:57:23 -0700 Received: by miles.sso.loral.com (4.1/SSO-SUN-2.04) id AA12022; Sun, 2 Jul 95 09:57:52 EDT Date: Sun, 2 Jul 1995 09:57:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Richard Toren X-Sender: rpt@miles To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: 2.0.5 commit date ?? Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk -- resend -- sent yesterday, but never saw it sent out on the list I am curious about the date and time that the 2.0.5R image was stripped out and committed for the new 2.0.5R CD. I have been archiving all the 'cvs' mail since Jan 95 as a reference that I can look at if I have a problem. I figure that any commits to the tree after that Date/Time are potential problems that I may encounter with the new system, even before the CD arrives. It never hurts to be prepared. ==================================================== Rip Toren | The bad news is that C++ is not an object-oriented | rpt@miles.sso.loral.com | programming language. .... The good news is that | | C++ supports object-oriented programming. | | C++ Programming & Fundamental Concepts | | by Anderson & Heinze | ====================================================