Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 22:04:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237068] /usr/local/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.30 assertion fail elflink.c:2824 Message-ID: <bug-237068-29464-IaPHrF6on6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237068-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237068-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237068 --- Comment #24 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #22) That looks to me like possibly lack of a symbol version script controlling what is exported from the relevant .so , creating symbol conflicts. It appears to me that trying to make that automatic interfers with C++ specific functionality as things are. (get_execution_seed and its handling of seed mixed with use of fixed_seed_override is not valid for C, just for C++. I'm not aware how to cause the link BFD_ASSERT messages via C, but I've not tried.) But how many symbol version scripts would be required if the automatic avoidance was not in place? (Messy?) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237068-29464-IaPHrF6on6>