From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 29 20:21:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from cc92687-a.wlgrv1.pa.home.com (cc92687-a.wlgrv1.pa.home.com [24.5.63.190]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36F737B401; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 20:21:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pat@databits.net) Received: from hex (pat@hex [207.29.192.16]) by cc92687-a.wlgrv1.pa.home.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f6U3Lex74170; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 23:21:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pat@databits.net) Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 23:21:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Patrick Li To: George Reid Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/29310: Fix bento checksum errors In-Reply-To: <20010730040305.K10831-100000@sobek.lan> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hrmm well i dont see a new version release... None of the ports is reporting error when port is installed that i know of. Most even has the same version # in the tarball name. I only submitted >50% of the checksum errors reported by bento not all without testing. I dont know what the author changed. If its just checksum update because of some change without new version of program released, then just PORTREVISION bump + checksum update should be it. Thats what i see happen most of the time and people just put chase checksum in commit message. Why would author want to make a totally drastic/non-minor change to their program without bumping the port's version up? -pat On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, George Reid wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Patrick Li wrote: > > > Is it not needed to up PORTREVISION for all > > checksum chase commits? > > We = you > > i would like to see bento stop erroring. > > changes probabily is so minor that author > > decided not to make new version. > > Having just hacked up a very quick-and-dirty script to compare the > distfiles listed in the Makefile and on ftp.freebsd.org, I would say that > your assertion is entirely false. > > I checked the first 9 or so ports listed in your patch and came up with a > diff between old and new tarballs which was 286,839 lines long. That's > hardly minor. > > -- > +-------------------+---------------------+ > | George Reid | FreeBSD Committer | > | +44 7740 197460 | greid@FreeBSD.org | > +-------------------+---------------------+ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message