From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 06:00:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5A616A4CE for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:00:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.net (defout.telus.net [199.185.220.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDA243D49 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:00:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfak@telus.net) Received: from [192.168.1.150] (really [64.180.28.217]) by priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP <20050114060025.EJZG18545.priv-edtnes46.telusplanet.net@[192.168.1.150]>; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:00:25 -0700 Message-ID: <41E75FFD.1050403@telus.net> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:00:29 -0800 From: Peter Kieser User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Siddharth Aggarwal References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: process checkpoint restore facility now in DragonFly BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:00:26 -0000 freebsd-hackers != DragonFly BSD Mailing List... --Peter Siddharth Aggarwal wrote: >Hi all, > >I am responding to a post back in Oct 2003 when the checkpointing feature >was announced for DragonFly. I have been doing some research on this, and >have seen some projects that use Xen VMM to achieve checkpoints of guest >OSes. > >So I was looking for inputs from people as to what everyone feels about >checkpointing, whether it should be done at the physical machine level or >VM level. Pros and Cons of each approach, if any further development was >done on DragonFly for checkpoint since then and if it was stopped, why? >Are there serious limitations to checkpointing a physical machine? > >Sorry for such a vague posting, but I thought this would be a good >platform to get some feedback. > >Thanks, >Sid. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >