Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Sep 1996 10:46:36 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        erich@uruk.org
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, smp@csn.net, peter@spinner.dialix.com, rv@groa.uct.ac.za, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Intel XXpress - some SMP benchmarks
Message-ID:  <199609131746.KAA09209@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <199609130639.XAA14603@uruk.org> from "erich@uruk.org" at Sep 12, 96 11:39:32 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The APIC register reference takes so long that the array reference is
> simply absorbed in the overhead.  I always get the virtual number (and
> possibly the APIC id, if necessary), then operate from there.

Doesn't it gall you anyway?  8-) 8-).

Guess I'm just a computational nanosecond kind of guy -- it's people
like me what cause unrest (and research into quantum computing).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609131746.KAA09209>