Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 10:46:36 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: erich@uruk.org Cc: terry@lambert.org, smp@csn.net, peter@spinner.dialix.com, rv@groa.uct.ac.za, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel XXpress - some SMP benchmarks Message-ID: <199609131746.KAA09209@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199609130639.XAA14603@uruk.org> from "erich@uruk.org" at Sep 12, 96 11:39:32 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The APIC register reference takes so long that the array reference is > simply absorbed in the overhead. I always get the virtual number (and > possibly the APIC id, if necessary), then operate from there. Doesn't it gall you anyway? 8-) 8-). Guess I'm just a computational nanosecond kind of guy -- it's people like me what cause unrest (and research into quantum computing). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609131746.KAA09209>