Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Nov 1999 21:54:59 -0500
From:      "Bob Cohen" <bcohen@bpecreative.com>
To:        "freebsd-questions" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Christopher Michaels" <ChrisMic@clientlogic.com>, <tyson@alumni.stanford.org>, <ales@megared.net.mx>
Subject:   RE: PnP Modem Question 
Message-ID:  <002d01bf2e4b$a40a0c10$0100a8c0@mojomatic>
In-Reply-To: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB4401105D77@site2s1>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I second this. FWIW, I use the PnP USR 56K
> faxmodem with no problems on
> > cuaa4.
> > I set up the interface with the /stand/sysinstall
> > utility;  I selected ppp0 on /dev/cuaa4 (COM5).
>  I did not do anything
> > to my kernel to make it work, nor did I use MAKEDEV.

It turns out that everyone had something relevant to bring
to the table.  cuaa4 WAS the correct device to specify in my
com software but I did have to perform a MAKEDEV to enable
cuaa4.  Go figure.  The weird thing was that I began the
process with cuaa4 but got an error message stating that the
device wasn't enabled.  I assumed it had something to do
with the serial ports as named sioX which in turn sent me
off on a wild goose chase.  cuaa4 is now enabled and my
modem seems to work.  Thanks to everyone for the help.

Bob Cohen



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002d01bf2e4b$a40a0c10$0100a8c0>