From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org  Fri Sep  9 06:29:50 2016
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3599BBD1445;
 Fri,  9 Sep 2016 06:29:50 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A16E5E7;
 Fri,  9 Sep 2016 06:29:50 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org)
Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 28F2F153F; Fri,  9 Sep 2016 06:29:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 06:29:50 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org>,
 Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r421549 - in head: . Mk
Message-ID: <20160909062950.GA18015@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201609081315.u88DF6vL044982@repo.freebsd.org>
 <190e2ef5-0f8c-efc3-bca1-7e5b541d3733@FreeBSD.org>
 <20160909062630.hofrsvjajt2wcel4@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160909062630.hofrsvjajt2wcel4@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree <svn-ports-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 06:29:50 -0000

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:26:31AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> NONE is not intended to be a fallback because one hasn't set yet the LICENSE
> knob[.]
> 
> I do like the 'NONE' word, it sounds accurate and straight forward to me,
> but I'm not native, if its sounds misleading we can still have a better
> word if one proposes.  But clearly imho UNDEFINED/UNCLEAR/UNKNOWN are
> representing what we aiming at here.

I agree with Mark, UNCLEAR is a nicer and having least unwanted connotations
word.

./danfe