From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Apr 27 11:17:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE62B1DF67 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:17:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from dec.sakura.ne.jp (dec.sakura.ne.jp [210.188.226.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F6791319 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:17:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from fortune.joker.local (123-48-23-227.dz.commufa.jp [123.48.23.227]) (authenticated bits=0) by dec.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2/[SAKURA-WEB]/20080708) with ESMTPA id u3RBH6Wf058447 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 20:17:06 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 20:17:06 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC on a published change to FreeBSD 11 kqueue file ops. Message-Id: <20160427201706.4799798253dec4fb805f9298@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:17:15 -0000 One (two?) question(s). Any mechanism for monitoring file alternation (modify/create/rename/...) should NOT avoid unmounting filesystem. With this aspect, are these patches conforming? If not, there should be some mechanisms to stop monitoring per device / share basis. Are there some? *Imagine removable medias and network shares. Before I found some pages stating gvfs-trash is evil and began running script to stop it if running, I must shutdown my computer only for removing mounted SD card. It's not acceptable behavior for base system. On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:32:05 +0800 Julian Elischer wrote: > the following change is sitting out at github, to add kqueue support > for more file operations: > > https://github.com/dmatveev/libinotify-kqueue/blob/master/patches > > does anyone have reasons why we shouldn't import this change. > > libinotify is now a port and could use these. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Tomoaki AOKI junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp