From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Sun Jan 13 23:08:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA906148C1F6 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:08:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F6295A1F for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:08:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0466B148C1F4; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DE5148C1F2 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7454795A1E for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABAC2B37C for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:08:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0DN8rSQ028321 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:08:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x0DN8rNb028320 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:08:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 234906] kernel panic: softdep_setup_inomapdep: dependency 0xfffff80107d15c00 for newinode already exists Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:08:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: cem@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 23:08:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234906 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to johan van Zanten from comment #13) > memtest86+ -- my laptop can't boot the ISO image on a USB stick ; maybe a= UEFI compat problem Yeah, memtest86+ is legacy BIOS only :-(. > Given that i wasn't have any problems using this same config as a desktop > running FreeBSD 10 or 11, with the same sort of workload, it seems less l= ikely > that RAM is the problem. Sure. > That matches the panic sting from Wed Jan 9 23:41:29 CET 2019, but assum= ing > that's where the system is panicking, one still needs to find out how the > system is arriving in that state. Yes, that's definitely the panic. The latter is the open question :-). One thing that landed in 12 for UFS was TRIM consolidation, which does inte= ract with softupdates and could plausibly explain this. You have trim enabled on ada0p2 (root) but not the other disk. You could try either disabling consolidation (sysctl vfs.ffs.dotrimcons=3D0) or disabling TRIM on the file= system (tunefs -t disable /dev/ada0p2). Also, kib did some softdep refactoring in 327722 and 327723; Kirk did somet= hing in this area back in 2016 in r304239. I don't know what if any of that was already backported to 11.x and landed in 11.2 or whatever. I'm not sure about the secondary panic. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=