From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 1 16:11:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D830816A400; Mon, 1 May 2006 16:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E034443D6A; Mon, 1 May 2006 16:11:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0F017610; Mon, 1 May 2006 19:11:44 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 19:11:43 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Pascal Hofstee Message-ID: <20060501191143.5a65686f@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <1146497892.31483.1.camel@synergy.odyssey.homeunix.org> References: <1146349274.16564.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200604301614.30077.andy@athame.co.uk> <200604301950.27364.andy@athame.co.uk> <44562619.3090403@freebsd.org> <1146497892.31483.1.camel@synergy.odyssey.homeunix.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, gnome@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org, Michael Nottebrock Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.14 being merged into the tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 16:11:48 -0000 On Mon, 01 May 2006 08:38:12 -0700 Pascal Hofstee wrote: > On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 17:15 +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > This wouldn't help the people running into the CONFLICTS right now (the > > dependencies are already registered in people's pkgdbs when they do, > > changing the kdelibs port won't fix that). We can try to make that work > > later. > > That's nothing a simple portupgrade -o net/avahi -f mDNSresponder > wouldn't take care of .. assuming net/avahi's mDNSresponder support can > be used as a drop-in-replacement. > > Please correct me if i am oversimplifying things here ... If you have both howl and mDNSResponder portupgrade -f won't work, -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #2: solar flares