From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 13 3:20: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4782F15245 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 03:20:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id TAA13324; Tue, 13 Apr 1999 19:15:10 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <37131436.644E6E48@newsguy.com> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 18:53:58 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chris@calldei.com Cc: Matthew Dillon , Mattias Pantzare , Amancio Hasty , Dmitry Valdov , Brian Feldman , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DoS from local users (fwd) References: <199904102051.WAA07790@zed.ludd.luth.se> <199904102057.NAA01570@apollo.backplane.com> <19990413004728.C1968@holly.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Chris Costello wrote: > > > If one can't control one's users, one has no business managing them. The > > last thing FreeBSD needs is some overly complex, sophisticated scheduler > > designed to help bozo sysops stay on their feet. > > I agree with you very much here. Public shell systems are a > bad idea. In my opinion, you should trust someone before you > allow them to have an account on your system. What you really mean is that "FreeBSD is not a solution for public shell systems", correct? Public shell systems is not a bad idea, it's a business opportunity and a public service. If the OS is not up to the task, don't blame the task. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "nothing better than the ability to perform cunning linguistics" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message