From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 13 18:52:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18B716A415; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CC143D5C; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:52:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [87.240.16.199] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1GNZqK-000JP0-Jl; Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:52:17 +0400 Message-ID: <45085364.5030709@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 22:52:20 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergey Matveychuk References: <20060913155444.58d97bd7@localhost> <20060913165052.GA16955@xor.obsecurity.org> <45084EB9.80101@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <45084EB9.80101@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, Stanislav Sedov , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: sdl port will be updated X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:52:18 -0000 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 03:54:44PM +0400, Stanislav Sedov wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> We are going to update all sdl ports to latest version. >>> This will require modifications to sdl-dependent ports, >>> and we are currently doing full build in tinderbox >>> to ensure that all goes right. >>> >>> Please hold you commits to sdl-depended ports while we finish >>> the update, since each commit will prevent this huge patch to >>> apply and will require another build in tinderbox. >>> >>> sem@ will commit this patch ASAP. >> I thought we already said to wait until after 6.2-RELEASE? >> > > I missed it. > Well, I've found the last message related to the topic and discovered I misunderstood a word 'probably'. So this HEADSUP should be ignored. -- Dixi. Sem.