From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Jan 17 12:57:35 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA21985
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 12:57:35 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from shell6.ba.best.com (jkb@shell6.ba.best.com [206.184.139.137])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA21979
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 12:57:26 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkb@best.com)
Received: from localhost (jkb@localhost) by shell6.ba.best.com (8.8.8/8.8.BEST) with SMTP id MAA01492; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 12:57:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: shell6.ba.best.com: jkb owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 12:57:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Jan Koum <jkb@best.com>
X-Sender: jkb@shell6.ba.best.com
To: Dinesh Pal <pdinesh@opentech.stpn.soft.net>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 2.1.0
In-Reply-To: <34BFC18E.254D@opentech.stpn.soft.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980117125614.342A-100000@shell6.ba.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


	You should really be running 2.2.x for stability, security and
other reasons. Ohh yes, 2.2.x is also well documented. :)

-- Yan

On Fri, 16 Jan 1998, Dinesh Pal wrote:

>Hello,
>
>Where can I get documentation for freebsd 2.1.0 on all the topics.
>
>dinesh Pal
>