From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 25 23:07:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8761116A4CE for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:07:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4828443D39 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:07:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd49554 (utd49554.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.85]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EAB389359; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:06:16 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:06:16 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: Gert Cuykens , Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <8F4A8FF7165E40F7BE9F13B0@utd49554.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: References: <200501242315.12888.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> <200501251530.06424.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <20050125055301.GB16896@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050125194736.GD76109@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050125224732.GA28662@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline cc: "Donald J. O'Neill" cc: Warren cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: perl and ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:07:14 -0000 --On Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:59:54 PM +0100 Gert Cuykens wrote: > > no why would it irritate developers ? Its just a question ? i only > want them to think a bit before they bring in perl to build there > application. > > I am not a developer so i can not think for them i can only ask > questions. I would not even ask them if the application itself would > use it. Then i would accept it as part of a furniture. > Let me get this straight. You're not a developer, so you don't know languages or how to code. Yet you're completely convinced that perl is insecure and should never be used anywhere, and you're equally convinced that no developer should be using it for their programs. Is that about right? > PS if you buy a new television do you still want the robotic arm of > the factory standing next to it in your living room ? > > I can only talk about cosmetic things as a user because i dont know > how a television works inside. Bad analogy. A better one would go something like this. When you buy a new television, you expect that the manufacturer used the best and most efficient techniques to build it. Yet, without any knowledge of why the manufacturer used those techniques, you think he was wrong to use them and he should change. What's wrong with this picture? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu