Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 17:33:50 -0800 From: David Syphers <dsyphers@u.washington.edu> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions Message-ID: <200412021733.50294.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <200412021723.52241.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> References: <200412021201.50234.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> <20041202231316.GA41896@xor.obsecurity.org> <200412021723.52241.dsyphers@u.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:23 pm, David Syphers wrote: > On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > What command-line are you using? > > Oops, sorry for the noise. I just realized that I was giving the -u option > to portupgrade, and I can understand why it can't do that without building > the port. Doing it without -u works fine. Or not, actually. It has nothing to do with the -u option. It fails whenever it has to fetch the package (which it does successfully). The next time it's run, when it has the package already, it succeeds. That can't be a feature, can it? -David -- "To get out of the Metaphysical Void, you either have to grasp the meaning of the universe or roll doubles twice." -Cecil Adams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200412021733.50294.dsyphers>