From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jun 27 2: 5:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from thing.orbitel.bg (thing.orbitel.bg [195.24.32.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB82637BF50 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 02:05:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tacho@thing.orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 9924 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Jun 2000 09:05:17 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 12:05:17 +0300 From: Stanislav Grozev To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing Objc Message-ID: <20000627120517.A9799@thing.orbitel.bg> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 01:59:53AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 01:59:53AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > While some of us are in an axe-happy mood, who else is in favour (or > against) the removal of the Objective C stuff? Nothing in the base system > uses it, and very few ports probably do (does anyone know of any?). We > could easily make it a port for those that do. > what's the gain? I for example use it for learning;-) btw. i don't mind a port, but what's the point of removing it from base? > Kris > -tacho -- [i don't follow] | daemonz.org/ | tacho@daemonz.org | 0x44FC3339 [everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler] [despite all my rage i am still just a rat in a cage] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message