Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 16:13:29 +0200 From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/36112: [PATCH] New feature for whole ports tree: GS_PORT variable Message-ID: <3F2D1889.4030609@liwing.de> In-Reply-To: <20030728132236.GA44652@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <200307272105.h6RL5BTo000730@helo.liwing.de> <20030727221222.GA93833@huckfinn.arved.de> <20030728114351.GA53070@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3F25126C.4030501@liwing.de> <20030728121703.GA63021@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3F25192B.1090502@liwing.de> <20030728124927.GA27827@rot13.obsecurity.org> <3F251FDB.2020708@liwing.de> <20030728132236.GA44652@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28.07.2003 15:22, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I think we're talking at cross-purposes. If latex2html is changed to > use GHOSTSCRIPT_PORT, then the port built with > GHOSTSCRIPT_PORT=print/ghostscript-gnu-x11 and WITHOUT_X11=foo will > have the correct dependencies. Hi Kris, I've not seen a commit of the patch from ports/36112. Do you need some groundwork to be done by someone else (eg. me)? Jens
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F2D1889.4030609>