Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 09:25:36 +1200 From: "Dan Langille" <junkmale@xtra.co.nz> To: James Snow <sno@teardrop.org> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pppd + natd Message-ID: <199809182125.JAA00876@witch.xtra.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809181129320.10711-100000@silver.teardrop.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warning: I don't know what I'm talking about. But I think I've seen suggestions that PPP uses ip aliasing so nat is therefore redundant. On 18 Sep 98, at 11:36, James Snow wrote: > > I'm having some trouble getting NAT going over ppp with pppd and natd. > > In this instance, the machines inolved look something like this > > 10.0.0.28 <--> 10.0.0.99/Dialup-IP <--> Dialup Gateway <--> Internet > PC pppd + natd ISP & the rest of the world > machine > > The output to the console as given by the -v option of natd is this: > > In [TCP] 10.0.0.28 -> some.real.net.ip:23 aliased to > 10.0.0.28 -> some.real.net.ip:23 > > Logic dictates, and some stuff I've read confirms, that this is not doing > anything. No change was made to the IP headers on the packets involved. It > should have read > > In [TCP] 10.0.0.28 -> some.real.net.ip:23 aliased to > 10.0.0.99 -> some.real.net.ip:23 -- Dan Langille DVL Software Limited The FreeBSD Diary - my [mis]adventures http://www.FreeBSDDiary.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809182125.JAA00876>