From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 28 16: 9: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com [207.113.159.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7E914FED for ; Fri, 28 May 1999 16:08:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gdonl@tsc.tdk.com) Received: from sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (root@sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.191]) by gatekeeper.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA05161; Fri, 28 May 1999 16:08:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gdonl@tsc.tdk.com) Received: from salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com [192.168.241.194]) by sunrise.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA08730; Fri, 28 May 1999 16:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gdonl@localhost) by salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA14638; Fri, 28 May 1999 16:08:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Message-Id: <199905282308.QAA14638@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 16:08:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: David Wolfskill "Re: not really related to but triggered from Re: (again) panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs" (May 28, 7:18am) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 alpha(3) 7/19/95) To: David Wolfskill , carl@xena.IPAustralia.gov.au, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: not really related to but triggered from Re: (again) panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On May 28, 7:18am, David Wolfskill wrote: } Subject: Re: not really related to but triggered from Re: (again) panic: v } >Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 13:02:50 +1000 (EST) } >From: Carl Makin } } >> ffs_mountfs: superblock updated for soft updates } } >Is it possible for this message to include *what* filesystem was update } >for soft updates? } } I mentioned this to Julian a while back; as I understand it, at the time } the message is issued, the requisite information is not available to be } included. What about fs_fsmnt[]? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message