From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 20 20:14:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (mail.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFF137BC16 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:14:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <115230>; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:15:30 +1100 Content-return: prohibited From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: openssl in -current In-reply-to: <19347.951098777@zippy.cdrom.com>; from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com on Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 01:09:21PM +1100 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <00Feb21.151530est.115230@border.alcanet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <88ptqh$264i$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> <19347.951098777@zippy.cdrom.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:15:29 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2000-Feb-21 13:09:21 +1100, "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > Simply swapping one openssl library for another ... > If we're going to go with that level of packaging granularity >then openssl belongs as a package and should not be part of the >bindist, end of story This sounds awfully like the way the crypt libraries were (and maybe still are) handled: Depending on how you answer the DES question, you wind up with libdescrypt or libscrypt (and a symlink from libcrypt). Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message