From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 22 04:19:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA43106564A for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spork@bway.net) Received: from xena.bway.net (xena.bway.net [216.220.96.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8D18FC14 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spork@bway.net) Received: (qmail 81088 invoked by uid 0); 22 Apr 2009 04:19:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.3.2.41?) (spork@96.57.144.66) by smtp.bway.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 22 Apr 2009 04:19:34 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:19:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Charles Sprickman X-X-Sender: spork@hotlap.local To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (OSX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: mod_cband replacement? X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:19:36 -0000 Hello all, mod_cband seems to be the most popular bandwidth management module out there, but it also seems to have been abandoned at some point. I imagine as apache development continues forward, it will eventually just not work anymore. What's a good replacement? I've got it running on a server that I'm replacing with a FreeBSD box, and it seems to work on the new box, but the amount of complaints about it I'm seeing via Google is a bit scary. I also get this when trying to use the status webpage: Apr 22 00:09:40 uniweb kernel: pid 51396 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 Bad sign... Thanks, Charles ___ Charles Sprickman NetEng/SysAdmin Bway.net - New York's Best Internet - www.bway.net spork@bway.net - 212.655.9344