From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 21 04:55:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0808A1E; Thu, 21 May 2015 04:55:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu [18.7.68.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87B71C52; Thu, 21 May 2015 04:55:40 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 12074425-f79ca6d000000e5e-cb-555d65450e4a Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id EC.40.03678.5456D555; Thu, 21 May 2015 00:55:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id t4L4tWvC014523; Thu, 21 May 2015 00:55:32 -0400 Received: from multics.mit.edu (system-low-sipb.mit.edu [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id t4L4tUOD012738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 May 2015 00:55:31 -0400 Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id t4L4tTUw012786; Thu, 21 May 2015 00:55:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 00:55:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Kaduk X-X-Sender: kaduk@multics.mit.edu To: Bryan Drewery cc: koobs@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: svn commit: r386873 - head/security/ca_root_nss/files In-Reply-To: <555D5D1C.6000100@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <201505201808.t4KI8ajp012568@svn.freebsd.org> <555D4216.5060303@FreeBSD.org> <555D5504.3030106@FreeBSD.org> <555D5D1C.6000100@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprCKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrOuaGhtqcGCjvMXvXxdZLU5s+cBi 0fXjMZPFxL7DTBa/Jr5itGj79I/dgc1jxqf5LAGMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZRz7UFuxir+h8 eJ6xgbGLrYuRk0NCwETi6t9TrBC2mMSFe+vB4kICi5kk2idWdDFyAdkbGSUuvFvNBuEcYpI4 9XYJVFUDo8SaOxogNouAtsTVeasYQWw2ATWJ9SuuMUNMVZTYfGoSmC0ioCHxv/USM8ggZoFZ jBIbbpwGGyQs4CSxeMsVMJsTaNCHSxOZQGxeAUeJjdcmsEJsPsMocWbWXLANogI6Eqv3T2GB KBKUODnzCZjNLKAlsXz6NpYJjEKzkKRmIUktYGRaxSibklulm5uYmVOcmqxbnJyYl5dapGuh l5tZopeaUrqJERTg7C6qOxgnHFI6xCjAwajEw7tBJTZUiDWxrLgy9xCjJAeTkijvbD+gEF9S fkplRmJxRnxRaU5q8SFGCQ5mJRHenGigHG9KYmVValE+TEqag0VJnHfTD74QIYH0xJLU7NTU gtQimKwMB4eSBG92MlCjYFFqempFWmZOCUKaiYMTZDgP0PBVIDW8xQWJucWZ6RD5U4y6HHem /F/EJMSSl5+XKiXOuwGkSACkKKM0D24OLDG9YhQHekuY9xlIFQ8wqcFNegW0hAloicm2SJAl JYkIKakGRqsXu3gOx9xZ4bR3J7/Jr7smq9bWRN/7Hrfu+NnoG/IOR+U1Kzgbnr8+H5p5UeZU 4gdHPc2z31eZ9pu3OOw4uF2mp4D7pUXlNZW8+Baj9XsbZrg7X1BZUfxT3H3CPQ6+O2smi2oJ iPZzGNtOlIw83PsgmYnz4eNjtQcU9pvtPGhj5ze9aMGWE0osxRmJhlrMRcWJALepm54nAwAA X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 04:55:41 -0000 On Thu, 21 May 2015, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 5/20/15 10:58 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > > > The RFC Editor maintains a list of expansions of abbreviations: > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt > > You mean like the actual TLS 1.2 RFC 5246? > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5246 > > It has many hits for Certificate Authority and 0 for Certification Authority. Indeed it does, as does https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-05 On the other hand, https://cabforum.org/ and https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6961 are the other way. (I did not put much care into the selection of those two particular RFCs.) TLS can be (and is!) used outside of the web PKI, whereas the CA/Browser forum is at the heart of the web PKI. I did not see a concrete request for action on my part; please let me know if there is something you would like me to do. -Ben