From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 00:57:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E54F16A41F for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:57:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robbak@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB93F43D45 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:57:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robbak@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so472254wra for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:57:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lHUjlcNlpVNfCubkj03kXCQM/mYtap7UkSBAdyeL95v1kedAdZoMJUxEf11Pn0rNISB8F03ObsTqRxzX4CUparPNDvM+KxHMcVoOaGRCT/x0I3iDFRupipJLXyCjrpBzQiAJJzVchzGYlxOSsxFzrVoS3CYx/NqyiuYQiW3Q6tI= Received: by 10.54.49.48 with SMTP id w48mr2489183wrw; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.128.12 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:57:53 +1000 From: Robert Backhaus To: Norberto Meijome In-Reply-To: <4312B091.9090104@meijome.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <55023220@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20050828150947.GA58038@82-168-75-155-bbxl.xdsl.tiscali.nl> <4312B091.9090104@meijome.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 and -O2 option X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:57:54 -0000 > > Kernel and world seem to be ok with -O2, for ports it is not advised. >=20 > Hi, > I may have missed a thread or something (just let me know :) ) - why is > -O2 not advised for ports on 6.0? > cheers, > Beto Simply because not every port works with -O2 optimisations. It caused bad code in some circumstances.