From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 11 13:09:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id B60E7E67; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:09:03 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: William Grzybowski Subject: Re: svn commit: r322724 - head/net-p2p/qbittorrent Message-ID: <20130711130903.GC72196@FreeBSD.org> References: <201307101754.r6AHshZl027414@svn.freebsd.org> <20130711054533.GA70334@FreeBSD.org> <20130711125532.GA72196@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, William Grzybowski , ports-committers X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:09:03 -0000 On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:03:05AM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:42:23AM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:54:43PM +0000, William Grzybowski wrote: > >> >> New Revision: 322724 > >> >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/322724 > >> >> > >> >> @@ -43,7 +46,7 @@ CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --disable-qt-dbus > >> >> .endif > >> >> > >> >> post-patch: > >> >> - @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's,qputenv,!&,' ${WRKSRC}/src/main.cpp > >> >> + @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|qputenv|!&|' ${WRKSRC}/src/main.cpp > >> > > >> > There are two problems with this part: > >> > [...] > >> > >> It would make everyones life easier if you had put a comment in the > >> post-patch line about that fact. > > > > True; usually I document any REINPLACE_CMD which might be confusing to > > others, in this case I thought it's kinda self-explanatory. The point > > is that 1) many porters/comitters do not document these things, and it > > might happen to anyone else; 2) regardless of the presence of comment, > > or lack thereof, anyone who is updating the port should recheck if any > > previous patch(es) are still valid. This was obviously not done here. > > Point taken, twice, and I appreciate your comments, I screwed up. > How long should I knee in grains of corn? ;) William, :) Man, sorry if I didn't make it clear; I was mainly not targeting you, but new maintainer (the last paragraph of my first mail suggests it). ./danfe