From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 16:14:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCC26FC for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-f174.google.com (mail-ia0-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8298315D5 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:14:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f174.google.com with SMTP id y25so11796486iay.19 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:14:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mCO8shV90VjOBI2MtLwcq7aZ3olx9sUL3ZZBoHiamFM=; b=uZl5S++erH4KJWQFvM8Gx4O2eJw2QlUkulDKlthhKYAVlhqo2wW6uSiLfzNnV8i14s CrVQhh7aVNEvYVkjXdpClPM7p3Nh7tuu+e/W6j1wqW4l5TXnbHiEq/p4DCTl60/0BNtI C/uE9q3CnVNdA86HMhEb31bQ5OUeID3K/FLOFUgNglHNLZS81LDgezdMHCo4XE4jN+ua N99c48POpUHlx/Ts2gbny1D8vx7rfADw9Q7mKVevEzSi7ao18XAUb9BAA7wooyvIDj92 zbF5u+Z3CMNABS9Yib0SCtcl8hDMu1AYClquM5DLSpyyR8HsMjhe0CUAYTTpO29Fp8Gl aC1A== Received: by 10.42.27.74 with SMTP id i10mr35266709icc.47.1357143296684; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:14:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.65.132 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:14:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <145c92bb-a450-4078-9f82-6ed17123a3ad@email.android.com> References: <12.BF.00942.82514E05@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> <145c92bb-a450-4078-9f82-6ed17123a3ad@email.android.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:14:26 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD? To: Derek Kulinski Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Eitan Adler , FreeBSD , Thomas Mueller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:14:57 -0000 On 2 January 2013 16:05, Derek Kulinski wrote: > Eitan Adler wrote: > >>On 2 January 2013 06:26, Chris Rees wrote: >>> To clarify, no-one wants to remove CVS completely, the suggestion was >>to >>> move it out of the base system. >> >>As the developer responsible for this: >> >>CVS will be removed from base. It already exists as a port in >>devel/cvs > > Will svn be added to the base? Not long ago I run into an issue when tryi= ng to downgrade my system to 9.0. > > After I noticed how majority of ports were broken due to changes in the l= ibc I decided to back out by fetching 9.1 release just to learn that svn do= es not work as well. There were a lot of dependencies I decided to use port= upgrade which required me to recompile ruby. After that it was a lot of com= piling (for example Apache because apr was broken). Having svn in the base = would save tons of time in my situation. It certainly wouldn't, it would mean that instead of only building when you installed the port, it would build with every buildworld :) http://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/base/user/des/svnsup/ needs fixing if you're feeling brave. It won't be easy, however. Chris