From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 25 14:41:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C91C16A420 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:41:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@MHoerich.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7967743D5A for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:41:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@MHoerich.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2005 14:41:35 -0000 Received: from p548B4EE2.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO localhost) [84.139.78.226] by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 25 Nov 2005 15:41:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5114400 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:41:33 +0100 From: Mario Hoerich To: Valerio daelli Message-ID: <20051125144132.GA2157@Pandora.MHoerich.de> References: <27dbfc8c0511230147y6618b19enc6fb1cd348ed1003@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <27dbfc8c0511230147y6618b19enc6fb1cd348ed1003@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: umapfs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:41:46 -0000 # Valerio daelli: [ compiling umapfs ] > ../../../fs/umapfs/umap_vfsops.c:56: error: prototype declaration > ../../../fs/umapfs/umap_vfsops.c: In function `umapfs_root': > ../../../fs/umapfs/umap_vfsops.c:300: error: 'td' redeclared as different > kind of symbol > ../../../fs/umapfs/umap_vfsops.c:298: error: previous definition of 'td' was > here > *** Error code 1 > > Do you think is still supported? Quoting from mount_umapfs(8): | BUGS | THIS FILE SYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT DOESN'T WORK) | AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT, DESTROY DATA ON YOUR SYSTEM. USE AT YOUR OWN | RISK. BEWARE OF DOG. SLIPPERY WHEN WET. | | This code also needs an owner in order to be less dangerous - serious | hackers can apply by sending mail to and announcing | their intent to take it over. Basically, I think that's a no. HTH, Mario