From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Tue Sep 15 15:17:53 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD306A04C03
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:17:53 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from structuralcadsoftware@gmail.com)
Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19A917E1
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:17:53 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from structuralcadsoftware@gmail.com)
Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85])
 by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22BC0158DE10
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:17:53 -0700 (MST)
From: CadSoftware <structuralcadsoftware@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <1442330273152-6039235.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJP=Hc8RTmFK5DL+ToiRbcSMQbBtTKVkGMtp2FJWbz=AY+QQBw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOtMX2jVwMHSnQfphAF+a2+o7eLp62nHmUo4t+EahrXLWReaFQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJP=Hc-RNVuhPePg7bnpmT4ByzyXs_CNvAs7Oy7ntXjqhZYhCQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <551C5A82.2090306@gmail.com> <20150401212303.GB2379@kib.kiev.ua>
 <CAJP=Hc87FMYCrQYGfAtefQ8PLT3WtnvPfPSppp3zRF-0noQR9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJP=Hc-WLKe3+DQ=2o21CY=aaQAjADrzEfnD7NVO1Cotu4vcGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5526EA33.6090004@gmail.com>
 <CAJ-VmonecBDemkfS=3nV2jiuJfOFJg7bZOacxOKXvTWktxBd9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <5527F554.2030806@gmail.com>
 <CAJP=Hc8RTmFK5DL+ToiRbcSMQbBtTKVkGMtp2FJWbz=AY+QQBw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NVMe performance 4x slower than expected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:17:53 -0000


I believe FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE includes an updated nvme (4) driver. Do these
changes fix the performance issues described in this thread?

Thank you.



--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/NVMe-performance-4x-slower-than-expected-tp6001866p6039235.html
Sent from the freebsd-hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.