From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 23 13:42:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from arjun.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [206.20.52.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5493B37B967 for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 13:42:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joy@niksun.com) Received: from falcon.niksun.com (falcon.niksun.com [10.0.0.167]) by arjun.niksun.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA60524 for ; Tue, 23 May 2000 16:42:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from joy@falcon.niksun.com) Message-ID: <392AED2F.582FC379@falcon.niksun.com> Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 16:42:23 -0400 From: Joy Ganguly X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers Subject: blocks and fragments??? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi all, do disk addresses in struct dinode ( di_db[] array) address block addresses or fragment addresses?? the comment in dinode.h says they are block addresses. but fs.h says addresses are capable of addressing fragments. will somebody please explain this?? thanx all joy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message