Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:49:02 +0100 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Subject: Re: Linux executable picks up FreeBSD library over linux one and breaks Message-ID: <4762FA4E.9040103@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4762DEEA.2070703@chuckr.org> References: <1196470143.4750af7f6accf@webmail.rawbw.com> <4752F825.8020505@chuckr.org> <20071203144159.irjelm2c0c8o8csw@webmail.leidinger.net> <47544B5A.9080903@chuckr.org> <20071205122123.phwu6uh7jksgcwk8@webmail.leidinger.net> <4760A7FE.9070409@chuckr.org> <20071213100821.bet532peog8g488s@webmail.leidinger.net> <4762989F.9070507@FreeBSD.org> <4762DEEA.2070703@chuckr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chuck Robey wrote: > I guess I might be wrong, but I have to say, wrapping everything really > does seem to me to be the hack. Call it a wrapper, call it a symlink, but it seems to me that you don't like linux libs in LOCALBASE *and* you don't like executable references in LOCALBASE (and these are the only two possibilities exposed by Alexander). I prefer the wrapper/symlink, because I think all linux stuff should be in /compat/linux. What do you propose, instead? -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4762FA4E.9040103>