From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 17:25:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF171AA; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: from mail.digiware.nl (smtp.digiware.nl [31.223.170.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABAE8FC08; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rack1.digiware.nl (localhost.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E1215343E; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:25:27 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at digiware.nl Received: from mail.digiware.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by rack1.digiware.nl (rack1.digiware.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8mdJ_FnfSn9W; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:25:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.67] (opteron [192.168.10.67]) by mail.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0623415343B; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:25:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50AD0E82.3070706@digiware.nl> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:25:22 +0100 From: Willem Jan Withagen Organization: Digiware Management b.v. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Smith Subject: Re: Increasing the DMESG buffer.... References: <50ACA59D.3080809@digiware.nl> <20121121101411.GG4535@server.rulingia.com> <50ACD522.7000706@digiware.nl> <50ACEE5B.8000901@FreeBSD.org> <50ACF891.4050105@digiware.nl> <1353513692.69940.7.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <50ACFC6C.8070506@FreeBSD.org> <20121122040251.G21191@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20121122040251.G21191@sola.nimnet.asn.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ian Lepore , "stable@freebsd.org" , Peter Jeremy , Andriy Gapon X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:25:28 -0000 On 2012-11-21 18:09, Ian Smith wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:08:12 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 21/11/2012 18:01 Ian Lepore said the following: > > > You know what would be great? Have this value auto-tune itself upwards > > > if bootverbose is true. > > > > This sounds /potentially/ neat. > > > > > The sound drivers now spit out so much stuff > > > with bootverbose true that you need like a 128k buffer to see the early > > > boot messages. > > > > I'd argue that snd_hda should not do that. It should use a different knob. > > If I had a +1 I'd spend it on this one. Great when you need it, but .. Why bother... Memory is so cheap these days. We're talking about 64Kb being "wasted". On average I would assume that there is more than this wasted in odd bits and pieces in the kernel. --WjW