Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 01:15:15 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@riderway.com> Cc: John <nesredep@gmail.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper Message-ID: <89073692@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <4734DA4C.90702@riderway.com> (Philip M. Gollucci's message of "Fri\, 9 Nov 2007 17\:08\:12 -0500") References: <cff9f2d10711091320q7825f190r8dc373b80155a9bd@mail.gmail.com> <4734D8B0.1060200@riderway.com> <4734DA4C.90702@riderway.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:08:12 -0500 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > John wrote: > >> I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making good > >> progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD can't do > >> flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the > >> linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. > >> > >> It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody > >> installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. > >> > >> So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered if I > >> would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox? > >> > >> Is that easier? More likely to work? > > http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2007-07/msg01919.html > ----> cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc6 ; make install clean > There is now: > cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f7 ; make install clean > which you should use instead -- its newer :) And please keep an eye at /usr/ports/UPDATING (about linux_base port). WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?89073692>