Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:53:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Hodges <rh@matriplex.com> To: Christopher Sedore <cmsedore@mailbox.syr.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: question: aio / nbio / kqueue Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10106251048380.72662-100000@mail.matriplex.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10106251331210.3561-100000@rodan.syr.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Christopher Sedore wrote:
> You might try using aio_waitcomplete instead of aio_suspend. I wrote it
> because I hated the aio_suspend/array methodology.
That does look like a nice alternative to aio_suspend... I'll have to
have another look at AIO then.
> You should also make sure you bzero the aiocb structure before use as
> some of the fields could cause strange behavior if left with random
> data.
Did that. But it never hurts to double-check :-)
Thanks,
-Richard
-------------------------------------------
Richard Hodges | Matriplex, inc.
Product Manager | 769 Basque Way
rh@matriplex.com | Carson City, NV 89706
775-886-6477 | www.matriplex.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10106251048380.72662-100000>