Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 05:10:19 -0800 (PST) From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/64425: [NEW PORT]: net/netatalk-devel Message-ID: <200403191310.i2JDAJuE014942@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/64425; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: tom@replic8.net Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/64425: [NEW PORT]: net/netatalk-devel Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:00:11 +0100 tom@replic8.net wrote: > updated port, fixing many issues, made 'portlint -A' my friend. > > new version is here (old one removed): > http://hannover.ccc.de/~e-moth/ports_net_netatalk-devel.tar.gz > http://hannover.ccc.de/~e-moth/ports_net_netatalk-devel.tar.gz.md5 > > MD5 (ports_net_netatalk-devel.tar.gz) = 8e60bbb33f5e7bb5df67d4f8b5ba0519 > > please comment, thank you very much! I still get FATAL errors with portlint -A. README.html is a generated file and not part of a port. Why don't you simply download 2.0 alpha2? Please use fixed snapshots when possible. If you want to add extra patches, you can add them as PATCHFILES, possibly conditionalized on WITH_CUPS_PATCH or WITHOUT_CUPS_PATCH. You should change the PKGNAMESUFFIX accordingly. You might want to convert files/netatalk.sh to a rcNG script, which should be easy if you are used to pkgsrc. The WANT_AUTO* variables are somewhat deprecated, please use the USE_AUTO equivaltents. Do you really need all those tools? Normally packages contain a pregenerated configure script, so that only GNU_CONFIGURE is necessary. Otherwise patching the configure script doesn't make sense. You should not need to patch ltmain.sh if you USE_LIBTOOL from the ports. Where is it that you use perl? I know that "See Netatalk's Makefile for more details on some of these options." is from marcus@ port, but I don't consider this very helpful. share/nls/POSIX share/nls/en_US.US-ASCII are not generated by your port, and shouldn't be part of the packing list. There are still manpages in the packing list. You should not remove user-editable configuration files, at least not if they are edited by the user. Please refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook: <http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/index.html>; -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403191310.i2JDAJuE014942>