From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 23 09:43:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A522916A4D0; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:43:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F09A43D5C; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:43:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost.nic.fr [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBNHhTDa041094 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:43:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hBNHhTIp041091; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:43:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:43:29 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200312231743.hBNHhTIp041091@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Tom Rhodes In-Reply-To: <200312231729.hBNHTZhB056790@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200312231729.hBNHTZhB056790@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Spam-Score: -9.9 () IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen sysconf.3 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:43:33 -0000 < said: > trhodes 2003/12/23 09:29:35 PST > FreeBSD src repository > Modified files: > lib/libc/gen sysconf.3 > Log: > Document many of the missing posix.1b options. Unfortunately, many of these are wrong. For example: +.It Li _SC_FSYNC +Return 1 if the system supports file synchronization, otherwise \-1. A brief examination of the source code (or, alternatively, the output of `getconf _POSIX_FSYNC') will convince you that this is not the case. -GAWollman