From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 28 13:33:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E95816A4CE; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:33:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skynet.stack.nl (skynet.stack.nl [131.155.140.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73D043D5A; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:33:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johans@mailhost.gletsjer.net) Received: by skynet.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id B491540CA; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:34:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailhost.gletsjer.net (tunnel03.ipv6.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5001::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by skynet.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434254042; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:34:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by mailhost.gletsjer.net (Postfix, from userid 801) id 723654237; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:33:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 14:33:13 +0100 From: Johan van Selst To: Volker Stolz Message-ID: <20050128133313.GB24486@taz.gletsjer.net> References: <200501281236.j0SCasgX061001@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501281236.j0SCasgX061001@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on skynet.stack.nl X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/76310: New port: www/cgiutils - cgi shell scripting utils X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:33:17 -0000 Volker Stolz wrote: > Two and a half issues: > 1) The PORTVERSION requires tweaking w.r.t. > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#PORTING-PKGNAME > It should be 3.0.a Thanks for the pointer. I blindly copied PORTVERSION from www/w3c-httpd > 2) I think we'd violate the copyright if you do not package > the COPYRIGHT-file. Incidentially, the same might hold > for www/w3c-httpd. This seems to hold for the MIT (library) copyright, but both programs claim CERN copyright. And that clause seems more liberal. I don't want to burn my fingers on this though. > Since the latter port contains the two binaries albeit not at the > same location, maybe it's not worth duplicating? Probably not. Although I could do without the gratuitous httpd binary and libwww... For now I want to drop the new port request and will reconsider. Probably the best solutions is to write my own version of these (rather simple but quite useful) programs from scratch, without the unnecessary library and copyright burden. This is not high on my todo-list though. > Get additional points for fixing the w3c-httpd-copyright :) ;-) > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=76310 Thanks, Johan