From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 23 11:56:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7671065672 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD5D8FC1B for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975EC19E027; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:56:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65CB819E023; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:56:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4ABA0CD5.7000007@quip.cz> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:56:05 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mrtg@subnets.ru Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: mrtg-traffic-sum is not installed by MRTG port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:56:10 -0000 Hi, I have one short question. Is there any reason to not install mrtg-traffic-sum which is included in the src of the MRTG? I am not saying "it must be" or "it is useful to all", I am just asking why it is not installed if it is the part of the MRTG pack and somebody may want to use it. I am not using it, so I am fine with current state, but it may be confusing to somebody who installed MRTG and can't run some command documented on the MRTG website. Can we have it as OPTIONS? Miroslav Lachman