From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Nov 19 10:43:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (grouter.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6892837B479 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:43:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from grondar.za (grapevine.grondar.za [196.7.18.17]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eAJIh8J15901 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 20:43:08 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200011191843.eAJIh8J15901@gratis.grondar.za> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "monotonic" counter commit candidate. Reviews, please. References: <20001119083438.B39585@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20001119083438.B39585@dragon.nuxi.com> ; from "David O'Brien" "Sun, 19 Nov 2000 08:34:38 PST." Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 20:43:08 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Why do we need a new header just for this? There is no other existing > per-platform header this could go into? And if we have to make a new > header, can we name it something more descriptive than "systm", or at > least spell it correctly so says "look in system dot h" the listener has > a chance of finding more easily. Bruce pointed out machine/cpu.h. Any objections? M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message