From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 22:31:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645E7106566B; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 22:31:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E466C8FC23; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 22:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vxc34 with SMTP id 34so1728606vxc.13 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:31:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=lsgSN7g3YbjNZeCqbmu04D1j1aRqKt8LV4b+4cdiCuU=; b=EUsnwQRrV0CinzU7gEIYMcBR0526N8CxlrkIiCL/wntjKZO+zHX4d4dDckdYeGJM4m 3ntXZtDglveTK8Y2bYLWSMJyo4t1CjOQV75GKnguavUMRIFsH4eTmc04duaBKlU/qPyt 1l5Gb55r7+cpEebi7eOckCVyddUHWt06y4pFA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=v5WcErKV6S71VITgKSnV4dM70WmudrPBz3mgzF7sY6u+VoZ4UuVuNS2Cu8hioJRpKJ aPnuTqwlQ06+AtqJfuJkzqWztpkxWyCQDdUsoRfcelnZ6Hc2zaQj7zNT4B2Oz7BkQR6u RL9V79HaTOcGO/JNG266TRhsDplen6nOFQXVo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.5.129 with SMTP id 1mr432571vcv.169.1299191465943; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:31:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.188.132 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:31:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:31:05 -0800 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Net , freebsd-current Subject: please (re) test if_ath in -HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 22:31:07 -0000 Hi all, For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test. I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced regressions. I'd like to make sure that I haven't broken legacy (11abg) support in weird/wonderful ways. I'd also like to make sure that I haven't broken/changed the behaviour or performance of the NICs in any way. Please give things a good thrashing and let me know the results. I'm still working towards debugging and enabling basic 11n support, but I need to first make sure that I haven't broken legacy operation in any way. Thanks, Adrian