From owner-svn-src-stable@freebsd.org Fri Mar 30 02:20:24 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2128F66DF8; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 02:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53BB070CA8; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 02:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 4BCD516296; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 02:20:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 02:20:24 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: rgrimes@freebsd.org Cc: Ian Lepore , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org, Marcelo Araujo Subject: Re: svn commit: r331728 - in stable/11/etc: . rc.d Message-ID: <20180330022024.GA60787@FreeBSD.org> References: <1522340373.49673.112.camel@freebsd.org> <201803291633.w2TGXinX064128@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201803291633.w2TGXinX064128@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 02:20:24 -0000 On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:33:44AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > ... > It seems that the Phabricator review system is somewhat disfunctional > in that actual review is only happening in some cases. Some people > have even stated they flat out hate it. Others say that it is the > way to go. As imp@ and ian@ had said it does not look too bad in src land, where people use it more or less correctly (putting up disputable changes, seeking review from people with better expertise or domain knowledge, etc.). It's far worse in ports when people often abuse it for trivial changes that should just be committed (and usually they are, without any activity in the Phab expect opening a DR and then closing it). ./danfe