From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 6 12:35:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAB016A4CE; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 12:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E32743D2F; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 12:35:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.250]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i56JZAkK005117; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 12:35:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i56JZA07095921; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 12:35:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i56JZAPL095920; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 12:35:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 12:35:10 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20040606193510.GA95886@dhcp50.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <40C36D31.4010003@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40C36D31.4010003@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! KSE needs more attention X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 19:35:11 -0000 On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 01:14:57PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > All, > > We are about 4-6 weeks away from starting the 5.3 release cycle. As it > stands, KSE still only works reliably on i386. I don't have any problems on ia64. > ... I'm willing to drop the alpha requirement and maybe even > the sparc64 requirement, but there absolutely will not be a 5.3 until > amd64 is solid. I think sparc64 should have KSE too. If we already accept that sparc64 is feature incomplete, we set/acknowledge a really bad precedence. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net