From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 13 09:14:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B2316A41C for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:14:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ray@redshift.com) Received: from outgoing.redshift.com (outgoing.redshift.com [207.177.231.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564F543D55 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:14:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ray@redshift.com) Received: from workstation (216-228-19-21.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.19.21]) by outgoing.redshift.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 02F30974D8; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 02:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.20050613021410.00a56bb8@pop.redshift.com> X-Mailer: na X-Sender: redshift.com Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 02:14:10 -0700 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: ray@redshift.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: FreeBSD 5.3/4 vs 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:14:05 -0000 Hello list, I've recently been doing quite a few benchmarks with regard to PHP and Apache, as well as stripping down the Kernel on 5.3 and 5.4 to improve performance for web/application servers. My question is: I was wondering if anyone out there has ever done a head to head test of 4.11 to 5.3 (or 5.4) and if so, is 4.11 faster in any areas and/or does it provide any benefits over 5.3+? Thanks. Ray