From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sun Sep 20 16:57:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141F7A054F7 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: from mail.ultra-secure.de (mail.ultra-secure.de [88.198.178.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D0691B0F for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:57:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: (qmail 12343 invoked by uid 89); 20 Sep 2015 16:57:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.200?) (rainer@ultra-secure.de@217.71.83.52) by mail.ultra-secure.de with ESMTPA; 20 Sep 2015 16:57:44 -0000 From: Rainer Duffner Subject: ZFS UEFI boot? Message-Id: <4B45B989-C3FF-4C60-A648-38603F0E63D4@ultra-secure.de> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 18:57:42 +0200 To: freebsd-stable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:57:53 -0000 Hi, according to the wiki: https://wiki.freebsd.org/UEFI#Tasks = it=E2=80=99s still unsolved and hasn=E2=80=99t even been started. According to the status report: = https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.html#ZFS-Suppor= t-for-UEFI-Boot/Loader = some work has been done. = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2015-March/047486.html= = The reason I=E2=80=99m asking is that all of our servers are HP DL = 3[6|8]0 Gen9. These servers only support UEFI boot (you can set them to legacy-boot = only for the next reboot). I would assume this to be true for more and more servers. I was playing with the idea of replacing the P440 controllers that we = normally buy for these servers with the H240 controllers (these can be = put into a so called =E2=80=9EHBA mode=E2=80=9C and then present each = disk directly, making them better suited for ZFS). However, the server still only boots with UEFI. And ZFS I want primarily to leverage beadm across all our servers...