From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jul 24 7:25:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF2A37B407 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 07:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caturix.genilog.net (mx1.mtl.distributel.net [66.38.181.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2848843E65 for ; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 07:25:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul@colba.net) Received: from colba.net (nat.MTL.distributel.NET [66.38.181.24]) by caturix.genilog.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id KAA13775; Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:25:06 -0400 Message-ID: <3D3EB9A8.E0B2977E@colba.net> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:28:57 -0400 From: Paul Khavkine X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Wemm Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Name service switch References: <20020723215150.F224D3807@overcee.wemm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well the one we have in -CURRENT lacks dynamic module support (as does IRS). I just wanted to know if there was any issues for not implementing IRS before ? Thanx Paul Peter Wemm wrote: > Paul Khavkine wrote: > > Hi folks. > > Since FreeBSD currently lacks a fully functional NSS implementation why > > dont we use IRS from BIND ? > > Is there any problems with that ? > > We already have NSS in 5.x, which is just as functional as IRS. > > Cheers, > -Peter > -- > Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com > "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message