From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Jan 31 8:26:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from peloton.runet.edu (peloton.runet.edu [137.45.96.205]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70DF814FCE for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 08:26:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@peloton.runet.edu) Received: from localhost (brett@localhost) by peloton.runet.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01862; Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:24:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from brett@peloton.runet.edu) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:24:59 -0500 (EST) From: Brett Taylor To: Andrew Kenneth Milton Cc: Parag Patel , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Still no luck with Linux Framemaker under FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <200001310420.OAA17881@mail.theinternet.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: > +----[ Parag Patel ]--------------------------------------------- > | > | I recently acquired an old laptop and installed 4.0-CURRENT on it > | along with Framemaker and the latest Linux 6.1 port. To make a long > | story short, it still doesn't work for me. > > What depth are you running at? > > Last thing I saw from Adobe, Frame would not run in any depth other > than 8 or 24 bpp Then I must be doing something magic! I've had Frame running fine under 32 bpp (under 3.4-STABLE). That said I'm too used to TeX to go back to a word processor. Boy, that sure sounds backward to the way computer software has been going doesn't it? Hmm... I wonder what that says about me?! Brett ***************************************************** Dr. Brett Taylor brett@peloton.runet.edu * Dept of Chem and Physics * Curie 39A (540) 831-6147 * Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics * Walker 234 (540) 831-5410 * ***************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message