Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:04:33 +0900 (JST) From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> To: gerald@pfeifer.com Cc: LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/gcc41 - libjava report - install report Message-ID: <20060411.150433.59650340.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604101601460.12375@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604091200030.12375@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <4439007F.8040605@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604101601460.12375@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604101601460.12375@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote: > On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> I'm a bit surprised, because I am not aware of any changes in GCC nor > >> libjava that could be responsible for such a change. > > I'm running gmake-3.80_2. > > Indeed, some tests on my side confirmed that GCC 4.1 again works and > builds libjava, with GNU make 3.80 and without consuming too much memory. > I plan to do some further tests and if these succeed as well, plan to > enable libgcj again for the next snapshot due later this week. Thank you very much! I also verified that with 20060407 snapshot. > (Maho-san, good news it seems!) Yes! All the best, -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060411.150433.59650340.chat95>