From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 2 12:13:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id AE56816A41B; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3B816A418; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4832D13C465; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 0C7D71A4D83; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 04:13:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 04:13:02 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <20080202121301.GY99258@elvis.mu.org> References: <200712020001.lB201XbN000811@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080202022234.GR99258@elvis.mu.org> <200802020818.57037.hselasky@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200802020818.57037.hselasky@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 129920 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 12:13:03 -0000 * Hans Petter Selasky [080201 23:18] wrote: > On Saturday 02 February 2008, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > This change makes very little sense. If xfer->frbuffers is a bare > > pointer, then why add 0 to it? Just pass xfer->frbuffers or use a > > macro that explains what you are doing. > > > > I can change those to a plain "xfer->frlengths". It was just a reminder for > me, because some places we use "xfer->frlengths + 1" and "xfer->frbuffers + > 1". > > I will write a script that converts all of those. What does '+ 1' mean? Is it something special like a channel or something? If so it should be a macro that's more descriptive. -- - Alfred Perlstein