From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Nov 30 17:38:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254C0C5DBF6 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com (mail-wm0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9D221FEC; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id g23so30481957wme.1; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:38:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=RFH55EFLELQtr0qV4AAyDryX7RmhKuy6zHB1mfFeo/c=; b=HvWcnf3K80l2FHy5S6M5+GCsKFCscG51K5oxs8ffolZlVjkTdjoaHOeH6XOtGbKj2P N+BDEZjNTcWk90NIVYtit4vdMnmL7lBmGL/Pleve4hazvqMgvZ+9o8oD7pF426UILMMv 322jL27ZcpXSjeZFggk9aQS2VczB4M+lH6WbjcXYg3CCVPYvSNvGd9/KNdYGbnKWBCs6 PBa31ed/X3W0lGg9CdfLNRt38ko5gv7k6X+jc6yUwm3+B+rqUPpu/o0hrkU3vELBg9tY FGwPfeINpYIp/V95Ehecu3pNQ94XjMFkyLNCKONU/dNqvfwFOOMgCJkO/nGWPdqr4JYC HfsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RFH55EFLELQtr0qV4AAyDryX7RmhKuy6zHB1mfFeo/c=; b=WrCgEJr8LDQIKr9knKS1wRR7XY8YlzeOXb8tbY30CQVjGuYUiuiWdUF5VuOY1hcVPK GFsrBjqqXsMJCRI8o/nU/ohM6EVZBL8wa1R24DNi9Y1J0N9agqwKyqhE78iEECJrAzSx 31tng0xcIGrYW/8XP26Yp2Yip0nFwEeVWO0zRgC8CqrtO2dI6k1KJAE3WkgbJgYGr8+j ztvHvUyQD51QeBDWjHDfyhwgo0EG4r9v0aRwHmf+l56CiMMfM0sXdWY4rg3gLxQe8nXL ka7P4Efi9tZvC3op91dhugB5mWl0nVxIm1RbGFvuy1VVBVQh4+mZ+ozVf7nhMabvLBdW ILCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02PfnIymIP0ogs1+aa/H+7m/UdtwSI67mOzjNKTxm6taKWKSjunOJJlfU78pnHTsX2ojnXjBl2IRxgJEg== X-Received: by 10.28.17.213 with SMTP id 204mr29761221wmr.17.1480527512794; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:38:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.28.58.76 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:38:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20161130172607.GB2648@home.opsec.eu> References: <922fa900-010b-ae3e-5f97-7dccac0e7eda@FreeBSD.org> <20161130172607.GB2648@home.opsec.eu> From: CeDeROM Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:38:12 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: XeeYWdoL5hsUo0UwZIC4dLJZiGE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [devel/protobuf] upgrade request to 3 To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: Kubilay Kocak , sunpoet@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports , oerg@freebsd.org, Dmitry Sivachenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:38:35 -0000 On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> This probably requires a new port (protobuf30), as it crosses a major >> version boundary (2.x -> 3.x) and judging by the presence of separate >> protobuf (2.6.x) and protobuf25 port. > > As far as I studied the issue, a new version is not required. See > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212973 Tanks! :-) It looks that 2 and 3 have different API. Keeping 'protobuf' up to date and leaving 'protobuf2' for legacy reasons seems to be reasonable.. :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info