Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 05:50:30 -0600 From: "eculp@encontacto.net" <eculp@encontacto.net> To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: ports/courier Problem imapd.core and upgrade Message-ID: <20061121055030.77d3wvg1y8kwk0s8@correo.encontacto.net> In-Reply-To: <20061120130547.28tk63z688cg4w4k@correo.conejoblanco.info> References: <200608101401.10726.clacroix@cegep-ste-foy.qc.ca> <200611151046.57877.courier-users@dino.sk> <cwhcx1uf17.wl%hiroshi.oota@necel.com> <200611151612.45225.courier-users@dino.sk> <20061120130547.28tk63z688cg4w4k@correo.conejoblanco.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Forwarded from courier users list. Quoting "Edwin L. Culp W." <eculp@conejoblanco.info>: > Quoting Milan Obuch <courier-users@dino.sk>: > >> On Wednesday 15 November 2006 12:26, you wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was not able to force that GAMIN called sendmsg which >>> was defined in libc.so. >>> Then, I modified COURIER-IMAP, instead of GAMIN. >>> -- >>> =09=09=09=09HIROSHI OOTA >> >> Great, I tested this and it works. I used it as basis for upgrade patch. = If >> anybody would like to try 0.53.3 with this patch, look for ports/105573 i= n >> FreeBSD PR database. I would like to get as much feedback as possible. > > I downloaded the pr patch and applied it manually and it broke the > complilation with fam but since I'm not sure if this should be fam > based or gamin based with the change. I would also appreciate your > attaching an empty mail/courier port with your changes, if you could, > just to be sure that my manual application was ok although they were > very simple but sometimes that is worse. > >> >> On a side note, I would like to know which add-ons are people using with >> courier. I have good experience with clamcour (security/clamcour in FreeB= SD >> ports) and a bit with pythonfilter (mail/courier-pythonfilter in ports). > > I am only using spamassassin and clamcour, that I agree works great. > What else is being used? I'm also thinking that maybe this should > probably be on the ports@freebsd.org rather than courier-users unless > other os's have the gamin/fam conflicts. > > I was just looking at my different courier installations and I see > that there isn't a gamin/fam standard. On some I'm still running > /usr/local/bin/fam -T 0 and newer ones, I'm not and they all work > although one is complaining about fam in the log file. I guess that > what I'm suggesting is that a best or recommended method be added to > the courier port. Life was easier before gamin but . . . > > Thanks to all, > > ed > > P.S. This may not show up in ports because I'm not suscribed with this > email address but maybe ;) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share yo= ur > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DD= EVDEV > _______________________________________________ > courier-users mailing list > courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061121055030.77d3wvg1y8kwk0s8>