Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:48:20 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org Ports" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: marking vulnerable ports forbidden? Message-ID: <20140715124819.GU93051@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CADL2u4gw7VSvuYwk_N26QnrOCyBd71=-R9U225372vYPEVz=Bw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADL2u4gw7VSvuYwk_N26QnrOCyBd71=-R9U225372vYPEVz=Bw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3pZQ0wszfDg7ZRO+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 02:45:19PM +0200, Ren=E9 Ladan wrote: > Hi, >=20 > according to Freshports [1] there are currently 24 vulnerable ports not > marked as forbidden. > How about checking this list on a regular basis and marking such ports and > forbidden and optionally as deprecated? This would inform users not using > vuxml earlier about vulnerabilities. >=20 > [1] http://www.freshports.org/ports-vulnerable.php Please mark them as forbidden regards, Bapt --3pZQ0wszfDg7ZRO+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlPFIxMACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyksQCfWCmCQl5UT0fKolK+80SQRDRF bkgAoKxQldtw/IrjmWuQBQQIwLjT9GJP =A4CX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3pZQ0wszfDg7ZRO+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140715124819.GU93051>